patching...
Update: Click to Get Teaneck News on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Concerns Raised Over Dog Run

Neighbor cites possible traffic, parking woes from park.

 

A plan to turn a section of Phelps Park into a dog run was met with concerns from area residents worried about its potential impact on the neighborhood. 

Wilson Avenue resident Bob Ghiradella, who said he was speaking on behalf of fellow neighbors, told council members Tuesday parking and traffic were among potential pitfalls of the dog park. 

"We dread to think of what will happen if the dog run is established and becomes popular," Ghiradella said. "Dog runs are not attractive places."

A metered parking lot is small and often becomes filled, Ghiradella said. On weekends, traffic from the park can cause backups on River Road. 

Ghiradella asked council members to consider other township parks for the dog run. 

Councilman Elie Y. Katz proposed converting a long-closed area of Phelps Park housing an abandoned swimming pool into a dog run. 

The Phelps Park pool has been closed for about five years. Estimates to make the pool compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act came in at $700,000. 

Dog run supporters have said the location is removed from nearby homes, and already has fencing and a water supply. 

Township Manager William Broughton said the pool has since been removed and work on the land was ongoing. 

A proposal to establish a dog run on Windsor Road, across from Temple Emeth, was scrapped after officials learned the project could impact wetlands. 

Share your views in the comments. Should the dog run be built in Phelps Park? 

 

Related Topics: Phelps Park and Teaneck dog run

george reskakis dds

7:39 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

There will always be people with "concerns". This is an ideal location for this amenity. The abandoned eyesore swimming pool must be removed, the dog commmunity has been clamoring for this amenity and there is PLENTY of parking. When you purchase a home next to a public park you must live with the consequences. People near ball fields get baseballs through their windows, fact. I whole heartedly support this initiative and commend Councilman Katz.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Rodriguez Gil

11:22 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

As a longtime resident with two dogs, I find it very difficult to find places to walk them since we also don't allow even leashed dogs in the park. I've always been surprised--and dismayed--at how undog-friendly Teaneck is in comparison to so many other towns.

Where there was once a pool there was also attendance from locals, as there is near baseball parks, etc.--there is one down the block from me and I'm fine with it. The type of people that bother to take dogs to a dog run are not people who think it's ok to let their dogs poop and not pick up after them and run around barking & bothering anyone. We are people who care about our animals and the community at large.

As a tax-paying responsible citizen, I've always felt my dogs deserve acceptance from the community as long as they're well-behaved and in control.

So come on, Teaneck, stop being such haters and thow us a bone here! ; )

Comment_arrow

TRINA

9:52 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I have lived next to Phelps Park for over 20 years. I have never seen so many kids use this park than I have in the last 3 years. I can not imagine how a pool would be a great asset to the kids of this neighborhood. Dogs can walk anywhere but kids can not swim anywhere. I have 2 children myself ages 10 and 4. Every year there is less and less to do with them especially with a failing economy. Restore the pool !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! k_trina08@yahoo.com if you want to sign my petition for this DOG RUN initiative. KATRINA HENRY

zizi

8:37 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Why can't the Dog community sponsor this project? continuing with your thought pattern "george reskakis dds" when you own a dog you should be able to sponsor a dog run and NOT ask tax payers to pay for the enjoyment of "the dog commmunity".

Reply
Comment_arrow

JAD

9:56 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Because this is part of living within a community and not within an extrememly rural area. Dog owners tax dollars pay towards amenities they may never use as well, childless people pay into a school system, those who dont own vehicles pay into the upkeep of the roads, and so on. This is not a difficult concept to grasp.

I cant think of one topic I've ever seen you post in that wasnt a negative comment from you. Perhaps I'd the costs of living here and recreational choices are too much for you, you should look into moving into a community that better serves your needs as there seems to be NOTHING in Teaneck you approve of.

Comment_arrow

cynthia jackson

12:30 am on Monday, September 10, 2012

Dog owners pay taxes like everyone else in this town so why can't some of it be used to have a place for the dogs to run freely. It's not high cost or high maintenance. We continue to spend our disposable income in other town when we are out because we have so little to offer.

shimon baum

9:02 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

How come nobody worries about the what impact high taxes has on neighborhoods?

Reply

zizi

10:21 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

JAD: stay positive my man......

Reply
Comment_arrow

JAD

11:06 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Zizi....................... I...................will................thanks.....................

You keep on trucked little lady ; )

Bark Barkley

10:59 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Let the doggies have their park!

Reply

zizi

11:06 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

@shimon baum: people like JAD are loaded and have no concerns about the ever increasing taxes........ in Teaneck. I really think Teaneck wants to force people like me out of this town..... I think the proper term will be "gentrification".

Reply
Comment_arrow

JAD

3:20 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

You are making a lot of assumptions about me. I'm unsure how you are able to decern anything about me as a person nor my stance on taxation from pointing out your consistent negative rambelings.

I do think our taxes are absurde for what we get here in NJ. I also have taken the time to learn that it is not from things like dog parks etc. Please take the time to do a breakdown on your own taxes and see where your dollars are actually being spent. You'd be surprised at how little of your total tax dollar actually stays within Teaneck

JamesTS

11:14 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Traffic from a dog run!??? Hilarious only in Teaneck!! Any small improvement is met with "concerns" from some person. I cant wait for the petitions and council meeting comments to delay this idea for years. Please just let the dogs have a place to run around! there are bigger problems to worry about people!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan Tuck

10:28 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Totally agree with you James, it is hilarious! Any activity at all from a swing to a basketball hoop will bring people and cars. Geez, come on. There are also streets that can be parked on. I think most people spend a limited time at a dog park anyway so they are in and out fairly quickly. Thanks Keith, who would know better than someone who actually lives there.

Keith Kaplan

11:46 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

I have met Bob many times walking with my daughter in and around Phelps. And while I sympathize with his concerns, I think they are unfounded. My backyard IS Phelps Park and I see firsthand how many dogs are walked through there on a daily basis (and hear them, as my dog will run to the door whenever another dog is in the vicinity).

The fact is, they are already there - it's moot. The pool is an eyesore that is just collecting moss and needs to be fixed up anyway. The plan to make it into a dog park is a novel way to make use of the existing structure. I'm in Phelps park every single day and have rarely seen the amount of traffic he mentioned at last nights meeting. The vast majority of cars park on Wilson and are from the folks playing Volleyball and basketball.

Reply

Keith Kaplan

2:24 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The blasting of music on the other hand...... IS something that needs to be taken care of.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

3:02 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

well Teaneck does have a noise ordinance...a call to the local cops will get it to stop :)

Comment_arrow

Keith Kaplan

3:05 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Karin, I'm all for people having fun and throwing a party and the ordinance they were talking about (I think) was for a time limit of a few hours. The parties that start with music blasting around 11am and are still going strong at 9pm are a bit much for residents that live around the area.

Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

3:23 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

well I suggest you get someone to enforce Code 27-3 section (M) then...

Comment_arrow

Keith Kaplan

4:20 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Can I combine that with 26-27(a) for a double?

Comment_arrow

Susan Tuck

10:29 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Well lets hope that the dogs dont bring any boom boxes with them.

Comment_arrow

Susan Tuck

10:31 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Actually to the best of my knowledge Teaneck does NOT have a noise ordinance. They generally say that people just need to be considerate all the time. In a perfect world this would be nice. Call the police and ask.

Comment_arrow

Keith Kaplan

2:27 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

There is simply no way the cops can diagnose what music coming from the parks falls under such subjective categories. Neither are they going to carry decibel measuring equipment.

There's really no reason for people to need an amplified sound system in a park like Phelps. Every park is different - Votee is made for such large and loud gatherings and doesn't have people living around the periphery. Phelps is not and is surrounded by neighbors.

Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

2:45 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

"that reproduces or amplifies sound in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance to any person on adjoining residential property between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 11:00 a.m. on the following day, and further provided that in no event shall the use of sound reproduction systems and/or electrified musical instruments exceed three consecutive hours for any event."....CODE 27-3 (M)

3 hour cap on loud obnoxious boom-boxes in parks....

Comment_arrow

Keith Kaplan

4:19 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

If only I didn't have to wait until after sundown to be able to use the phone.

I dOnt find the need for ANY amplification in such a small park surrounded by houses by average people throwing an event. If it's required, they could either use a large park (like Votee) or get a permit.

Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

4:41 pm on Sunday, September 2, 2012

Perhaps the people annoying you with their loud music are actually suffering from some sort of hearing impairment? mental impairment? Have you ever gone up to these offenders (noise) and asked if they could lower the volume?

Pam Montalbano

2:36 am on Sunday, September 2, 2012

This is about the dogs! Dogs run are beautiful things. they are places that not only dogs delight in but people do too! I was in a dog run today in a different state than New Jersey, and it was a friendly fun place to be. Grass is a great surface for a dog run by the way. those chips and dust that are over at Overpeck at very dirty especially in dry weather. Green grass is more absorbent and softer and cleaner both for the dogs and for the people who go there with them. Yes make a dog run as quickly as possible.

Reply

Keith Kaplan

3:33 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Looks like the town has been busy - the Phelps Park pool is now the Phelps Park fenced in blacktop.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/trfyh7tg691rkqp/2012-09-03%2015.09.13.jpg

Reply

Leave a comment