Freeholder Explains Why He Abstained on County Police Vote
Effort to disband Bergen County Police Department failed with a 3-2 vote.
Bergen County Freeholder John Driscoll released a statement Friday explaining why he opted to abstain from a hotly-debated vote on folding the county police department into the sheriff's office.
The freeholders on Wednesday voted 3-2 to reject an ordinance that would have eliminated the 89-member county police department. Freeholder Joan Voss also abstained.
Driscoll's full statement is below:
“I want to take this opportunity to give my reason for my abstention vote on the County Police ordinance. I have sat and watched as this ever import issue was batted around over the last few months. Since July I have been calling for the three leaders of law enforcement in Bergen County to come together on this issue. I believe that there are cost savings that can be found in our law enforcement community. That said it will only be found with the combined efforts of the law enforcement leaders, the Freeholder Board and the County Executive working together. The proposed ordinance did not accomplish that in my opinion. I cast my abstention as a signal that while the proposed ordinance was not the right course of action, the idea of finding savings should still be sought. I again call for all of us to come together at the table to work for the taxpayers of Bergen and find true cost savings while at the same time continuing to deliver the high quality public safety that our residents expect and deserve and which none of our elected officials would ever compromise.”
Related Stories:
- Freeholders Reject Bergen County Police, Sheriff Merger [POLL]
- Freeholders Vote to Dissolve Bergen County Police
- County Police Merger is 'Nonsense,' Ex-Officials Say
- Donovan Sues Freeholders to Stop County Police Merger
- Bergen Residents Want Details on County Police Merger
- Two Freeholders Plan ‘Listening Tour’ on County Police Merger
- Donovan, Saudino Spar As Task Force Rejects Cutting County Police
- The Fight Over The Future Of A $22 Million Police Department
Mike Kupchik
10:22 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
John, I'm fed up with the annual increases of my taxes that well exceed any gains I get to address them, and assume I'm in the majority. At this point, my family needs to survive, so to "heck" with those thinking we can print our own money! Sorry, but a vote of "present" doesn't cut it anymore.
Kelly Van Rijn
11:33 pm on Saturday, October 6, 2012
Driscoll is a failure. You were elected into office to lead. You failed. If the idiot voters of Bergen County re-elect him, you have only to blame yourself for such wretched politicians. The Bergen County PD is a phenomenal waste of taxpayer money. It should be disbanded at once. Every single town in Bergen County has its own PD- we don't need these guys. At all.
Dennis Martinez
7:29 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
When you serve in a leadership capacity you are often faced with voting on a matter as it is presented to you. It comes with the territory. To abstain is to imply that those you represent will not have any voice on the issue. This person should step aside voluntarily or should be voted out at the next election. We need our elected officials to have the courage to take tough stands. This guy obviously doesn't have what it takes and he failed those he represents.
Chris
7:58 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Joan Voss also....
USA1
8:18 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Driscoll you are a bloated idiot, you should be ashamed of yourself. If you were so concerned about this issue you should have voted to make it 3-3 and put Donovan that bug eyed witch in her place. Please grow a pair, this issue should be voted on by the people not allowing Donovan (the worst offender) and 7 people who are voting (or in Voss and Driscolls case NOT voting) because of political gain or loss.
Max
9:46 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
John if you can't vote to allow of keep our money, you are voting to take it and waste it.
NDW
10:07 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Abstention is not leadership it represents a lack of it. The voters sent you there to represent them. On a matter having to do with public safety and taxes you abstain? If you run again I will abstain too.
Howard L. Pearl
10:47 am on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Driscoll’s answer was an embarrassment on so many levels that it is difficult to know where to begin.
(1) Even if his drivel has any truth to it, how would the public even conceive of such a warped thought process?
(2) Could his abstention possibly cause the other freeholders to work toward so-called “cost-savings” in law enforcement? Obviously, a resounding “NO”.
(3) Would he even have released any statement at all if there wasn’t such a negative public response to his abstention?
(4) Was he on a retreat with Joan Voss, where they had no contact with the outside world, so they did not know that they were supposed to vote on important issues?
Phil Jonas
12:45 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012
Driscoll is exactly what the Record called him: "A weak candidate."
This clown is still planning on running for state seante. He won't raise a dime!
Baba O'Riley
11:34 am on Monday, October 8, 2012
His arrogance blinds him from reality!