patching...
Update: Click to Get Teaneck News on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Massive Oak Could Become Teaneck's First 'Historic' Tree

Tree along Cedar Lane is 250 to 300 years old

 

The Teaneck Township Council is expected to vote Tuesday on a measure that would designate a centuries-old red oak tree along Cedar Lane as a historic site.

An ordinance to add the tree to the town's list of historic sites was introduced last December after a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commission. If approved, the move would make the massive oak the town's first tree to be granted historic status. 

The tree is 250 to 300 years old and located on the site of the former Samuel Campbell farmhouse, built sometime before 1837, according to the library's virtual village website. 

A resolution prepared for Tuesday's meeting calls the tree "a remnant of a rural landscape that contributes to the historic character" of Teaneck. 

Residents have repeatedly pushed to save the towering oak. Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg's late husband Irwin successfully fought to block a developer from chopping down the tree to make way for a parking lot decades ago. 

A former property owner, the Union for Traditional Judaism, sought to cut down the tree but backed off after an outcry from locals

The Puffin Foundation later donated money allowing the tree to be granted a conservation easement in an agreement with current property owner Congregation Netivot Shalom. Under the easement, the tree will be preserved until its natural death and maintained by the county parks department. 

Related News: 

Follow Patch on TwitterFacebook and click to sign up for Breaking News Alerts. News tip? Story idea? E-mail teaneck@patch.com 

  • Should the Red Oak be Designated a Historic Site?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        14 (77%)
    • No
        4 (22%)
    Total votes: 18
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Cedar Lane, Teaneck Township Council, and Teaneck red oak

Art Vatsky

8:35 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Better a tree than another bank.

Reply

Orthowatch

9:56 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Even though I don't understand what the big deal is about it, I'm fine with it if that's what the town wants - it's not that important to me.

What historic value does a tree represent? I understand old homes. They can show us how people lived 300 years ago, and give insights to historical figures who stayed in those homes. But what does a tree show us? But like I said, it's not too important to me, so go ahead and keep it.

One thing I do want is for them to keep a close watch on it. A few years ago, a large branch fell off the tree into the middle of the street. Luckily nobody was hurt, but if it happens again, we might not be so lucky. I think any branches that hang over the street must be trimmed so we don't have any problems. History is nice, but public safety comes first.

Reply

JamesTS

10:13 am on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

The tree seems safe to me... look at all the storms it has last through! Anyway, i like this tree and all but i am really amazed and somewhat disturbed by how long this taken and how much time it is taken up by the council and other town agenices. We have stories closing every week now and this is what gets attention?? that makes no sense to me!

Reply

John Santaella

1:39 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

It is an old tree. Fine, let's take care of it. But what historic significance does it hold?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carole R

9:19 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

In Gettysburg, they call their old battlefield trees "Witness Trees"....they've seen a lot of history. The Teaneck tree has seen lots, too, I'll bet.

Joanna Hafner

1:52 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

I just worry if the tree fell and if it hurt or killed some one it is a possibility historic site or not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Santaella

2:49 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

A tree fell in town a couple of years ago during a storm and two men were killed. This, unfortunately, can happen anywhere.

Comment_arrow

Sheldon Aronowitz

2:40 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Well ANY tree can fall and hurt or kill someone - so do you propose that ALL trees be cut down????????? Your statement is IDIOTIC!!!!!!!!!!!

paul

2:36 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

The significance of the tree is clearly stated in the article:
' "a remnant of a rural landscape that contributes to the historic character" of Teaneck.'

Just as an old house provides insight into how people used to live, a patch of land preserved as it was 300 yrs ago can provide insight into how people lived.

Re: public safety, let's be realistic & think beyond the potential hazard of falling limbs. These hazards are easily offset by the collective benefits provided by this big tree & others in terms of the provision of green space & canopy cover. These provisions improve the aesthetics & character of a place in addition to increasing property values. Big trees are a very valuable part of public and private space. Their benefits are particularly tangible when we realize how much more comfortable it is to live in areas with extensive canopy cover that shades our parks, public sidewalks, yards and houses in summers.

Also, there is a wealth of scientific value associated with these old trees. Climatologically, a network of old trees can provide insight into past atmospheric and hydrologic conditions across a landscape. Ecologically, the canopies of large trees in urban areas serve as important stopover points for migratory birds, as well as links to more extensive forested areas.

Links to the past are valuable and this old tree is a great part of the history of the township, as well as the broader landscape. Let's hope the Council preserves this site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Santaella

2:50 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

by this explanation any old tree in Teaneck can be declared 'historic'. I'm sure there are other trees in town that are several hundred years old.

TeaneckUSEDtoBeGood

3:31 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

We have potholes in our streets that have been around longer than the tree.

Reply

John Santaella

9:58 pm on Tuesday, January 22, 2013

@Carole R, it's too bad the tree can't keep track of all the cars the go through the red light on the corner of Cedar Lane and Palisade Ave.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carole R

5:46 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Indeed, John, but that's a whole other topic!

zizi

9:42 am on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

What about the dirt in the town... that is older than any thing else.....

Reply

Trylon Man

2:06 pm on Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Some people don't have any sentiment or sense of history that tree has been living since before the civil. I was very upset when the last structure from the original farm on the site was torn down sometime after I moved to teaneck in 1980. The soil is old but technically not alive what about rocks? Oh sorry they are in some of these people's heads

Reply

Leave a comment