patching...
Update: Click to Get Teaneck News on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

How Did PSE&G Do After Sandy? [POLL]

Great? Good considering the circumstances? Woeful? Share your views in the comments.

 

Most of Teaneck lost power after Hurricane Sandy, closing schools for days and bringing businesses to a halt around town. Some residents were without service for more than 10 days, and others saw power go out again when a snowstorm hit

PSE&G says Hurricane Sandy was an unprecededented disaster, among the worst in the history of New Jersey. More than 1.7 million were without power at its peak. It takes time to work through even with the tens of thousands of crews brought in from other states, the utility told customers.

"Since the start of the storm, PSE&G call centers have handled more than 1.9 million calls (more than 12 times the normal volume)," the utility said in a written statement.

"This is not your average storm. Hurricane Sandy has caused twice the damage as Hurricane Irene. This means that even assessing the damage is slow, with new information constantly filling in the picture of the conditions that need to be addressed. We’ve also continued to bring additional out-of-state crews to help, and move them around to the areas they are needed most."

How would you rate PSE&G's response to Sandy? Take the poll below (note: you have to have a Patch account to vote)

  • How would you rate PSE&G's response to Hurricane Sandy?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Excellent; they worked quickly, efficiently and effectively
        2 (9%)
    • Fair; considering the circumstances, they performed adequately
        11 (52%)
    • Terrible; the ineptitude PSE&G displayed during the storm was staggering
        8 (38%)
    Total votes: 21
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Hurricane Sandy, PSE&G, Power Outages, Public Service Electric and Gas, and Teaneck power outages

JamesTS

11:33 am on Monday, November 12, 2012

I blame allthe unkempt trees more then I blame PSEG. They had so many outages because trees were coming down all over.

Reply

Teaneck_Resident

12:09 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I'm with JamesTS on this. If the trees were not so over grown we would have had less issues.

Reply

Axxa

12:22 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I agree wholeheartedly with JamesTS. A huge township tree fell across power wires around the corner from me, taking with it a generator and utility pole, all three ending up on my neighbors roof. PSE&G could not address the power loss problem until given clearance by the township regarding the tree...Which in this case took almost 2 weeks to resolve. Teaneck's tree rights laws need to be addressed. I was the lucky recipient of 2 trees planted between my sidewalk and curb about 6 years ago. BTW, the trees have not been pruned since planted and are currently putting tension on power/phone lines. In addition I now have to pay a township vetted contractor almost $1000.00 to repair/replace sections of sidewalk that the roots from those very trees have damaged...not to mention that the damage makes me liable to anyone who hurts themselves while walking on "my" sidewalk. Insanity!!!

Reply

zizi

3:16 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I agree with JamesTS on this..... (first time)...... Teaneck township is responsible for all these outages we suffer from every storm....... Huge trees... these should not be even planted on 2 feet of land.....
I recently visited Canada and saw that the town I stayed in had small little trees all over... I asked and found out that the town mandates what kind of trees can be planted. They have no problems with downed trees..... They also don't have to employee an army to do leave pickup.... I also saw that they have automated trucks that go by the street while sucking all leaves via giant vacuum placed on the trucks..... only one person was cleaning up the streets without even setting a foot on the ground.... much more efficient and quick....
Teaneck has a huge army at DPW taking care of these giant trees all year round costing us so much money....... huge trees that constantly destroy side walks and the residents have to pay for redoing the side walks.... DPW comes in to grind the roots.... what a joke.. only to revisit the site again in a few years......
I suggest we auction off all of these trees to a lumber company and the money can be used to modernize our infrastructure.... and than lay off extra heads thus lowering our taxes in the future.... but this means less red tape..... for some here... that means less income.... I expect people to oppose me for making these rational suggestions......

Reply
Comment_arrow

jazz

9:11 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

These trees were planted and protected by liberal minded people. Your a nice guy wanting to lay off people who worked 12 - 17 hour days for over a week to get your power back on. Meanwhile their homes had no power and they could not be with their families.

Comment_arrow

zizi

11:01 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

Jazz: It is absurd to keep people employed when they can be doing something useful...... somewhere else.... I see that residents of Teaneck are paying huge taxes so that some hard working people can work really hard when that hard labor is not even needed or desired. I think it will be agreat service to let these people find some useful employment while saving tax payers some very needed cash.

J

4:04 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

i dont disagree on the lack of attention to our township's trees but here are some examples that took place during the aftermatch of the storm that are inexcusable. A group of volunteers from Missouri were assigned to help out Teaneck in the cleanup and removal of trees and limbs from wires. Just as they were clearing a tree from several wires near my home, PSEG turned on the grid, wires came to life and one started a fire because it wasnt connected. The volunteers were nearly electrocuted. PSEG was called to come in to inspect the wires (after power was shut down) and they sent a gas expert instead of an electrician expert. There seemed to be very poor coordination and communication between many sides (town, PSEG, volunteer lumberjacks). What is more confusing to me is that because power was turned on to the grid in my area for 2 minutes, PSEG took everyone off their "no power" list for 2 days until we called back and complained we had no power. In their words "a new work order was issued because they lit up the grid and the all "ok" signal was returned to PSEG from their systems." - I also blame the town for their lack of preparedness in the way they communicated during the aftermath. To gain information I had to either be one of the 500 "friends" of one of the council members on facebook or read this blog. Yes the town was posting on their website but not daily. All we heard was 7 to 10 days, and keep calling PSEG. Why did it take 6 days to open a shelter etc?

Reply

Jim Dunleavy

4:28 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I have a mixed feeling about it. During Irene we lost alot of trees, now some more, yet the alternative...no trees for me is unacceptable. Until the lines go underground we will have these issues when trees fall, trimmed or not. Certainly they looked more organized than LIPA and JCPL who both have people out still. That comparison though I know is a relative one. The coordination with volunteers is hard, though I think whoever was supervising them, if they did have supervision should have known to tell them not to clear trees that were in any way connected to a line for fear of what actually happened. The calling though to tell them when you are out I think needs an explanation from PSEG

Reply

shimon baum

5:49 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

Don't forget driving down the streets with piles of leaves and tree branches. It's an obstacle course.

Reply
Comment_arrow

zizi

11:03 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

@shimon: and we have some real hard working people about 57 of them working in DPW doing some real hard work...... Teaneck looks like a disaster zone more than 2 weeks after the storm........ somehow I find it hard to believe we have 57 people working full time to clean the streets.... meanwhile.... we pay for our garbage too......

henry frisch

7:23 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Scottsdale is beautiful without any trees. Why can't we limit Teaneck trees to a height of 25-30 feet. Severe pruning is the cheapest way to keep our people safe and comfortable.

Reply

JamesTS

2:20 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I dont like height limiting is the best way but can we take an "inventory" of trees or conduct inspections to determine which are sick? I am not tree expert but a basic drive around Teaneck shows me many trees that seem dead. Why wont anyone take this on? I truly do not understand why there is not more urgency on the matter. I really dont blame PSEG alone for this mess.

Reply

Bruce Jones

7:21 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I guess we now know what Mr. Romney meant by the Michigan trees being the right height - below the power lines (sorry I could not resist - lol). But seriously, there is nothing wrong with cutting down hazardous trees and replanting with greater care and management. There is no reason for bushes and weeds to be growing up the power lines until they cross the street at Windsor Road and Palisade Avenue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teaneck_Resident

9:45 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Maybe it's township not wanting to spend the money on tree management?

ghgfhfg

2:22 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012

The law “is stuck http://www.coachoutletmls.com in a Jim Crow-era time warp,” said Edward P. Blum, director of the Project on http://www.hermesbeltsoutletsc.com Fair Representation, a small legal foundation that helped organize http://www.coachfactoryonlineen.com the suit.
Civil rights leaders, on the other hand, pointed http://www.coachfactoryoutletonlineau.com to the role the law played in the recent election, http://www.coachoutletuso.net with courts relying on it to block voter http://www.coachbagsoutletel.com identification requirements and cutbacks on early voting. http://www.coachoutletonlinegc.com “In the midst of the recent assault on voter access, the http://www.coachfactoryonlineae.com Voting Rights Act is playing a pivotal role beating http://www.coachfactoryonlinefn.net back discriminatory voting measures,” said Debo P. http://www.guccibeltsoutletds.net Adegbile, the acting president of the NAACP Legal Defense http://www.coachoutletstoreze.com and Educational Fund.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on the law, expected http://www.coachoutletonlinexc.net by June, could reshape how elections are conducted.The http://www.guccibeltsmb.net case concerns Section 5 of the law,

Reply

4113113dadfasd

4:28 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012

ore cheating means http://www.coachoutletonlinest.com the MOOCs will have to develop new tricks to verify identity http://www.coachoutletonlinescoach.net and tamp down on plagiarism and illicit collaboration. Both edX and Udacity, http://www.coachfactoryoutlettx.com a rival MOOC provider that was founded by former Stanford professor http://www.coachoutletstorexd.net Sebastian Thrun in January, have partnered with Pearson to offer proctored final exams. http://www.coachfactoryoutlettx.com But although Pearson has more than 450 test centers in 110 countries, making http://www.coachfactoryoutletrb.com students in an online class, many of whom live in rural areas, come to a testing center http://www.coachfactoryonlinefc.org for the final exam is an old-school solution.Some http://www.coachoutletwy.com higher-tech options on the table include a system of remote proctoring, http://www.coachoutletaol.net currently under development at Coursera, in which students place their passport http://www.coachoutletstoreonlinesl.com or other identification cards in front of their webcam and then begin http://www.coachoutletonlineybw.com taking the test while a human proctor

Reply

Leave a comment