Residents Push to Have ‘Destructive’ Tree Removed
Township officials say tree is no risk to property.
The months-long quest by an Alicia Avenue woman to remove a town tree she says is threatening her property continued Tuesday, as residents urged the Township Council to take action.
Resident Ruth Brower has continually appeared at council meetings to share her concern that roots from a swamp red maple tree in front of her house are invading her yard and could threaten her foundation.
“There is almost 12 feet of solid root mass covering my lawn,” Brower told council members in her latest plea for help Tuesday night. “My home, to me, is more important than this particular tree.”
Because the tree is on public property, Brower cannot remove it. She said public works crews could remove the “destructive” tree and presented council members with a petition listing more than 40 signatures supporting her cause.
Louise Jones, another Alicia Avenue resident, also pressed for the tree’s removal.
“I urge you to act and caution you against further delay,” she told council members. “The tree is impacting negatively on her property and mine.”
Jones said she was concerned because four trees came down in a recent storm.
While Brower maintains the tree is jeopardizing her property, township officials said they have thoroughly reviewed her case and found it posses no property risk. Township Manager William Broughton said he inspected the site along with the Department of Public Works and the town’s tree expert.
Officials have offered Brower suggestions for dealing with the tree’s roots, including installing an in-ground barrier.
Broughton said the town must follow a fair process for assessing the issue and cannot simply cut down a tree because of resident complaints. He said Teaneck has at least 500 swamp red maple trees.
“That’s 500 trees we would have to cut down just because they have roots coming out of the ground,” he said.
Officials will continue to monitor the tree, he added.
The council was mindful of Brower’s concerns, but had no authority to order crews to cut down specific trees, said Mayor Mohammed Hameeduddin. Township tree experts had investigated and more reviews were possible.
Councilman Elie Y. Katz said he understood the town manager needed to handle all resident concerns equally, but hoped to see a resolution to Brower’s alarm.
Calls to cut down the tree have become a near constant topic at council meetings in Teaneck, which often touts itself as “tree city.” Although officials maintain Brower’s case has been carefully reviewed, Councilwoman Barbara Toffler said action must be taken.
The Shade Tree Advisory Board was asked to examine the tree, but the group only serves in an advisory role.
“I think that this is absurd,” Toffler said. “This has become almost a town joke.”
Information about swamp red maple trees is attached from the LSU Coastal Roots Program
Tim Blunk
11:51 am on Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Newsflash: "Teaneck trees move to have destructive residents removed..." More at 5:00.
Dawn Lopez
12:45 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012
The last few storms and the town's tree trimming efforts have made eyesores out of some of the trees in town. My neighbor and I each have a tree that looks like a gnarly stump over thirty feet high in front of our property. The town tree specialist should take a ride around and perhaps have some of them removed and replaced with trees that do not interfere with utility poles. If the town does not want to pay for removal and replacement, they should allow the homeowner to handle it. I am sure I would choose a much more lovely tree than the town would since they would be too concerned about the cost.
Barbara Ostroth
1:55 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012
In addition to either allowing residents to cut down trees (after inspection by township authorities), the town needs to have a better system of tree maintenance along streets and also in public parks. Some of our parks (Votee, Argonne, Tokaloka, etc.) have many trees which have fallen in storms, huge limbs hanging from others, etc. which need to be cut up and removed.
Lynda Kraar
4:02 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Trees are the new snow. We'd better face it and start to manage it accordingly. (sigh)
JamesTS
6:31 pm on Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Trees are out of hand in this town. People have been killed and smallest storms cause blackouts. i think this problem has been ignored for too long.
Diane Schwarz
9:45 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012
Mass incarceration demanded for destructive and"out of hand" trees! Put them all behind in ground barriers!
zizi
1:25 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Town employees who insists on keeping trees should buy insurance against tree related damages from their own paychecks to cover for possible losses. It is absurd that the town can insists on keeping trees that the residents think are a danger to their properties. Who is the boss here... the town employees or the residents...... Cut down any trees that resident consider dangerous. Please stop more tree plantations... we already have too many trees in Teaneck.... Over time we will save on planting the trees and than trimming/cutting them. Let residents take care of things for themselves.
shimon baum
12:25 pm on Monday, June 11, 2012
So if the tree comes down and kills her does the city take responsibility or is it still her fault?