Teaneck Moves Ahead on Contaminated Park Cleanup
Advisory board announces recommendations on Votee Park soil contamination.
A proposal to handle contaminated soil discovered last year in Votee Park came in significantly below initial cost estimates and calls for work to be completed in about four to five months.
The township is preparing to enter a contract with Somerset County-based environmental consultant JM Sorge, based on a recommendation presented Tuesday by the Environmental Advisory Board Respecting Votee Park.
Under the proposal, an area in the southwest corner of the park contaminated with lead would be remediated and soil samples from around the park would be averaged to come up with a measurement below state guidelines, said Advisory Board Chair Dr. Kenneth Hoffman.
The park was ordered closed Dec. 14 after testing found levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, and PCBs above state guidelines. The levels, however, did not exceed federal standards.
"Most of the elevated levels of PAHs are in the northern side of the park. If one side is heavy and one side is light you can use different areas to balance each other out," Hoffman said in detailing how averaging could be used.
"If any hot spot was unable to be averaged out then that area would be selectively removed," the board's presentation to council said. "Very few areas, if any at all, are expected to need this procedure."
State health officials have already said the soil contamination presents no health risks and the 40-acre park was reopened in April. That finding, Hoffman explained, was confirmed by the advisory board through reviews of published federal guidelines. Another panel of independent academics have also found no cause for concern.
"What we are really dealing with here is a regulatory issue as opposed to a health issue," Hoffman said.
A deed restriction limiting the area to parkland will be needed to fall within state guidelines. Officials will also need to certify that groundwater would not be used for drinking, Hoffman said.
Hoffman estimated the total cost at about $100,000, far less than worst case scenarios first considered when officials were unsure how extensive remediation would need to be. Additional costs were possible if one or two higher concentrations of contaminants needed to be removed.
Based on a recommendation that the southwest lead hot spot be removed, some added expense is possible to better plot the impacted area.
Exact figures would emerge in the coming weeks as the township drafts a contract with JM Sorge.
Under the proposal, a project to resurface Votee's soccer fields with artificial turf would be on track to begin in November.
Tuesday's recommendation came after the volunteer park advisory board reviewed three environmental firms, out of 10 possible candidates. JM Sorge was selected over Langan Engineering and Environmental Services in a final review. Seven of the firms opted not to submit proposals, Hoffman said.
Langan suggested using a grass cover to remediate the contamination with yearly inspections. While both firms agreed there were no health concerns, the ongoing costs of inspections was unclear.
The state Department of Environmental Protection will review Teaneck's proposal. Agency spokesman Larry Ragonese said he could not speculate on the proposal before the report was submitted.
A PDF file of the advisory board's presentation is attached to this article.
Follow Patch on Facebook and Twitter or subscribe to our free daily newsletter
John Santaella
2:53 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Let me see if I understand this correctly. If I put one foot in hot water and one foot in ice water on average I'm comfortable? Makes sense.
JamesTS
2:57 pm on Thursday, August 16, 2012
Now we have had three or four different boards, panels, and other people reviewing these results. Everyone is saying there is no risk to health, it is from ingestion so no risks. As per NJ Dept. of Health, there was no risk. This seems like the right plan to put this matter away and get things back to normal. ITs one thing not to trust the town but now these independent experts and other standards are confirming what we have been told. Also: the standards did not come up over the federal levels. I think things are OK. Lets proceed without delay and get this done. thank you to all who helped and served on volunteer boards.
Josh Hosseinof
2:51 am on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
So the question is then are the state standards that raised this whole stink then too over-protective and not realistic in real-world situations? How were the stricter state standards generated in the first place - by some officials at the state DEP and input from outside experts? Are the outside experts also people who run businesses that test for soil contamination and do environment cleanups? If so, then they have a vested interest in making the standards as strict as possible to generate as much business for their industry. As you said, all the different groups that looked at this specific case said there was no health issue - yet according to the state standards the levels were too high for safety. So either the state standards are wrong (and in this case they seem to agree that they are), or there is an issue that is being minimized to fall under the state standards.
zizi
8:32 am on Friday, August 17, 2012
Why is Teaneck even concerned about this........ let it be.......
Teaneck sucks.... more tax money down the drain...... probably kickbacks are the reason we need this...... work done....
Bruce Jones
9:04 pm on Tuesday, August 21, 2012
Mr.Cohen: I have not followed this story. Could you give a recap as to how the park was contaminated? Is there a natural level of contaminants in the soil? Does the level of contamination increase through sun, wind or rain? Did dumping or external force cause the high levels? How can the township manage the problem after the remediation?
Noah Cohen
2:20 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Here's a few earlier articles with background on the issue:
http://teaneck.patch.com/articles/teaneck-s-milton-votee-park-closed-after-soil-contamination-discovered
http://teaneck.patch.com/articles/teaneck-officials-to-reopen-votee-park