patching...
Update: Click to Get Teaneck News on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Teaneck’s Milton Votee Park Closed After Soil Contamination Discovered

Citing possible environmental cleanup costs, Township Manager halts additional work on old police building renovations.

 

Milton Votee Park was ordered closed after routine soil tests revealed contamination levels above state safety guidelines, Township Manager William Broughton said in a statement released Wednesday night.

An architectural firm working on a project alerted the Township Wednesday morning that an environmental consultant had found levels of Benzo(a)pyrene and PCBs in a section of the park, the statement said. The levels did not exceed federal standards. The architectural firm, Gianforcaro Architects, Engineers & Planners, had been hired to work on the installation of an artificial turf field on a 4-acre area of the park currently used as a soccer field. 

Officials immediately closed the park Wednesday after learning of the test results, the statement said. 

“We expect additional testing will take a few weeks, after which I plan to hold a community meeting to share the results with the public and also discuss our plans for remediation of the affected areas,” Broughton said in a statement. “All efforts will be made to open the park as quickly and as safely as we can.”

A perimeter walking track will remain open, officials said.

Broughton said residents should remain calm and more information would be released as it’s collected. 

"This just happened today and we got right on it," Broughton said in an interview Wednesday night. “I don’t think people should panic but it’s cause for concern for us because we want this to be a safe area for people to enjoy.” 

PCB levels were found to be at 1.7 parts per million under a soccer field, more than the state’s .2 parts per million limit, but under the federal levels, Broughton said. Benzo(a)pyrene levels were measured to be at .36 milligram per kilogram, above the state's .2 limit.

Broughton said the environmental consultants told him that the PCBs were only harmful if ingested.

Samples were taken about six feet below ground, and the top soil had not yet been tested, Broughton said. 

The source of the contamination is believed to be from fill used in the park decades ago, Broughton said in a follow up interview Thursday morning. The parkland was once a swampy marsh. 

"It may have been filled in the 30s," he said. 

The field would be fenced off, along with additional police patrols and signs around the park. 

Superintendant of Schools Barbara Pinsak was alerted, and Mayor Mohammed Hameeduddin said he was not immediately aware of any events being rescheduled. 

It was not known how long the park would stay closed. Hameeduddin said officials didn't have any cost estimate for the cleanup yet. 

“It’s hard to judge these things without knowing how much we have to cleanup,” Hameeduddin said. “Our number one issue is public safety.”

The possible costs of the cleanup prompted officials to halt work on the old police station project. 

“Votee Park must be our priority in terms of spending taxpayer dollars and I cannot in good conscience continue with the old Police building until we know the full fiscal impact of the cost of remediation of the Park,” Broughton said in the statement.

Votee is Teaneck’s largest developed park and includes paved walking pathways, an in-ground swimming pool, basketball courts, an amphitheater and playground equipment.

PCBs have been shown to cause cancer, according to the federal Environmental Protection Agency. The manufacture of PCBs was banned in 1979. Benzo(a)pyrene is believed to cause cancer in humans. 

Article updated at 11:20 a.m. Thursday with additional comments from Township Manager William Broughton. 


Karin Kiesow-Irvine

8:07 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Yeah, who in their right minds builds a park on top of a landfill not expecting issues at some point! DUH!

Reply

Paula Rogovin

8:36 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

During the 1980's, when I biked or walked around Votee, I could see that the company that had the contract to dump "top soil" for soccer field renovation, was actually dumping junk. This included stuff that looked like it came from a landfill. I reported this to the then manager - who did nothing. The same thing happened at the Southern end of Votee, on the West side of the street. I reported that, too, and was ignored. If the current administration and Council look up the records re soccer field renovations - perhaps those administrators and contractors can be brought to justice. THEY KNEW they were dumping bad stuff.

Reply

Art Vatsky

8:44 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I think the Manager and Mayor should be commended for taking prompt and prudent action, protecting both public safety and our stressed municipal financial resources. It may by that PCBs were not known to be dangerous back in the 1950s when they were buried there. Hopefully remediation will be limited, complete and reasonable in cost.

Reply

Carol DeVoe

9:30 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

I would be curious to know about the experiences of other municipalities that have dealth with this same calamitous and costly predicament. What are some best practices for remediation we can learn from?

Reply

Eric Fettmann

11:46 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Please, let's not have a repeat of what Paramus went through in 2007 when soil at one of its middle schools was found to have elevated levels. The school was shut down, which was followed by public hysteria, threats of physical harm against public officials and thousands in unnecessary costs for what proved not to be a significant threat to anyone's well-being.

Reply

Jason Flynn

11:55 pm on Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Eric - I hope you are 100% right. But as a coach of multiple sports in that park, parent playing with my children in that park several times a month, spending 150+ hours in that park a year, I really hope it is a very minor issue. For now, I will just hope and pray it is minor, will be quickly cleaned up and that our township's children are not, and were not in harm's way.

I am proud to live in a town that saw an issue, quickly publicized it and is working on cleaning it up.

Reply

Patricia King

4:32 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Pretty disturbing, though I commend the manager for his swift actions to close the park understanding public safety, I am nonetheless concerned about the children like my son(s) who have been playing soccer on that field since they were very young. Votee was not originally built on a landfill. Perhaps if you go over to degraw and Teaneck rd towards NJ turnpike those buildings were built on landfills. The real concern is or will be the potential harm of exposure residents and particularly children might have from this contamination. I'm deeply concerned that children who play soccer and fall down in that contaminated soil and wiping their faces when they become sweaty what that could mean down the line for their health. I look forward to follow-up information on this tragedy!

Reply

Art Vatsky

6:13 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Patricia: The best part of this bad news is that the current samples do not exceed federal standards so concentrations may be measurable but still low. Hopefully that will be confirmed when a more thorough sampling is taken. Perhaps PCBs and benzene may have to be ingested to cause problems. I think the Township should get the EPA involved immediately to get the latest accurate health risk information to us.
Paula: Your report is scary. Knowingly using contaminated soil for public parklands sounds like a criminal act.

Reply

Patricia King

6:28 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Yes Art, while that is true I wonder if there's a way to find out what the original levels might have been or how potentially high? Do PCBs and benzene chemical compounds deplete over time or remain at the original levels? I am hopeful that an EPA or an environmental expert will conduct a thorough and extensive study on the soil and as experts provide information regarding how and in what manner these contaminants can or maybe harmful. Far be it for us to surmise! Again, I am concerned because though the current samples do not exceed federal standards, they most certainly exceed the state standards thus the reason for closing the park.
I expect with urgent and rapid response and due diligence, this issue will be dealt with appropriately!

Reply

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

6:49 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

"Broughton said. Benzo(a)pyrene levels were not immediately available. Broughton said the environmental consultants told him that the PCBs were only harmful if ingested."...yeah this part bothers me. Inhaling/skin contact are also harmful to humans not just ingesting them (PCB's).

Reply

Patricia King

7:07 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I have full confidence in the township Manager and his staff that they will correct the problem and provide the township residents with the requisite data. The township Manager's rapid response demonstrates his concern and understanding of this potentially dangerous situation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

7:22 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I am glad you have the confidence but after reading that the environmental company is giving incorrect information I am a bit leary...even the EPA says inhaling or skin contact is an issue/problem.

Avi Bloom

7:11 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

The entire town of Teaneck is contaminated with harmful political Liberal toxins and the state has no money to remediate. So, no private jobs = no public money.

Reply

Jason Flynn

8:41 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Avi,

While I agree with you that very often Teaneck manages to turn many topic into politics, cultural, religious or other divisive conversations, how could we question the move the township did this week with Votee Park?

I am strongly hoping and praying that this is a relatively low reading, the more sophisticated testing will result in similar low numbers and the matter can be addressed fully, at a reasonable cost. But when we have thousands of people using the park monthly, including most of the township’s youth regularly, be it by way of youth recreational sports, club sports, THS sports or just family fun, how could we not error on the side of caution and SHUT IT DOWN asap and get experts on scene to test, clean up and certify that our children are and will be safe?

Please don’t misinterpret my comment to be that I do not want people to voice their opinions or points of view, but when we are dealing with our health and the health of our children, how could being cautious and thorough ever be political?

Reply

Who Is John Galt

10:54 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

I wonder where the Mayor learned that the park had been a landfill in the 1950s. I recently saw pictures of the park, then called central park, from the 1940s. I think he may be wrong on this one and if so what is the real source of these contaminants?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

11:18 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

"Central Park was developed with Federal funds, by W. P. A. labor during the Roosevelt administration, at no cost to the Township, The W. P. A. paid 5 cents a yard for fill dumped into this low-lying swampy land, Votee said. The fill, taken from a sandpit east of Cedar Lane near Teaneck Road, was trucked free of charge, he added.

The entire park cost the Township less than $100,000, the former Mayor said. Since most of the lots were sold at auction for taxes, the Township acquired title to most of the land, and had to buy only a few pieces."
http://www.teaneck.org/virtualvillage/mayors/votee_m/votee2.html

Who Is John Galt

11:25 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

So where did he come up with this 1950's landfill business I wonder?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Noah Cohen

11:29 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

In a follow up interview this morning, the Township Manager said the source is believed to be from fill used in the park. The park was not a landfill, he said.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

11:35 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

thanks Noah for the update, guess the Township Manager was a tad confused yesterday but at least he clarified his statement today. I wonder if he is going to believe the Environmental Company that only ingestion is dangerous instead of believing what the EPA is telling us that inhaling/ingesting/ or contact with our skin is dangerous.

JamesTS

11:45 am on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Thank you for these updates.. we are worried but i do thik the Town Manager has done a good job getting the word out. We should see the middle ground here: Above NJ regulation but BELOW federal... that probably means it's not a huge issue. I do still give our Town govt credit for responding immediately and staying on it. I will be reading for more updates.

Reply

Charelle Wilson Hanley

3:30 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

After years of coaching soccer in those fields for women, boys and girls I can tell you that there were many people who ate dirt and had lots of contact with the soil in the soccer fields. It is a “contact sport” and as such, the players not only have contact with each other but the field too! How about the games played in the rain!! Please, don't get me started, it's pretty obvious to me that many of the people that I coached and played with "ate dirt" plenty of times.
But, while we're at it, why not check the possibility of contamination at the area in the park where the bathrooms (I use that term loosely...) are located. They have been nasty since I was eight years old! I can't believe that the water currently draining from there, the products from cleaning that area and waste is any safer than the soccer fields! My friend and I walked the park this summer and had to walk around the waste water from the urinals and whatever else is coming from the original bathrooms that were built back in the day. It's another possible area that is posing a safety hazard in the park. It needs to be checked. The bathrooms should be bull dozed and a new, sanitary facility should be built for the public to use.

Reply

Dee Are

9:26 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

"The field would be fenced off, along with additional police patrols and signs around the park. "
I hope that the additional expense, on my tax dollars, will prevent the contaminants from escaping. But what if the PCB's can't read signs, or elude the police?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karin Kiesow-Irvine

10:58 am on Friday, December 16, 2011

as per the Bergen Record- "The important thing to note is that even though it’s above the residential and non-residential standards … it’s 5½ to six feet down. No one is coming into contact with it.”...and lets not forget that they now have found Mercury in there but the contamination is only a problem as per the Township Manager if you eat the dirt which totally contradicts the EPA and others that state inhaling/skin contact are also a problem!

Alan Sohn

8:36 pm on Sunday, December 18, 2011

After about 15 years of having my kids play soccer at Votee, I must have a two or three cubic yards worth of park outside my front door, where I had the kids clean off their cleats before stepping inside. I always knew it would be the right thing, but I guess now would be a good time to return all that dirt back to Votee Park from whence it came.

Reply

Tony

9:47 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

I seriously hope people know the park is closed and contaminated. Drove by there a couple of times yesterday in the early morning and just after noon. The yellow tape only loosely cordoned off the park areas, and the warning signs looked like they were no bigger than 8.5 x 11, in black lettering. In short, not much of a warning to stay off the grass, etc. I doubt the town is taking this seriously.

Reply

DMAB6395

3:07 pm on Monday, December 19, 2011

I drove by yesterday it didn't even look like the park was closed-is it still closed? I saw people walking thru there. I think they should put up better things than yellow tape to keep people out of there. Like big signs every 100 feet or so, & can't they do a reverse 911 to let people know it's closed & why? Put flyers on people's doors or mailboxes to let us know. I don't go to that park anymore-it's close to my house but my kids are all grown up now & we no longer have a dog but I think it's important to know that this is closed and why-also what are they doing to clean this up would be nice to know also. I agree with you Tony I don't think they are taking this seriously at all.

Reply

Leave a comment